Techniques vs principles

Tim's Discussion Board: Concepts : Techniques vs principles
   By Maciej (Unregistered Guest) on Friday, January 02, 2004 - 03:42 pm: Edit Post

Yi Chao Shen - You can conquer the world with just "ONE" technique.

Having heard people be famous by his "technique" and have not heard anybody got famous by his "principle".


   By Mark Hatfield (Unregistered Guest) on Friday, January 02, 2004 - 04:24 pm: Edit Post

George Bush


   By Meynard on Friday, January 02, 2004 - 05:32 pm: Edit Post

How about Newton?


   By Kenneth Sohl on Saturday, January 03, 2004 - 05:41 am: Edit Post

Maciej, that's only if that one technique embodies the correct principle :-)


   By Mark Hatfield (Unregistered Guest) on Saturday, January 03, 2004 - 08:47 am: Edit Post

Don't forget, observers can see your technique, they can't 'see' the principles behind the technique.


   By Bob (Unregistered Guest) on Saturday, January 03, 2004 - 02:24 pm: Edit Post

Don't forget Tim in that list. Tim is just like my grade school Principal. He had good technique based on principles which proved more often than not, quite painful and effective.


   By Maciej (Unregistered Guest) on Saturday, January 03, 2004 - 02:42 pm: Edit Post

But Bagua, taiji, and hsing yi although share the same principles, rely on different techniques correct?


   By Walter (Unregistered Guest) on Saturday, January 03, 2004 - 03:04 pm: Edit Post

That is incorrect, the three big internals share SOME principles in common byt each also has principles unique to that art. AFAIK


   By ninjin (Unregistered Guest) on Sunday, January 04, 2004 - 10:46 am: Edit Post

maciej's post was copied directly from the emptyflower board:

http://www.emptyflower.com/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi/YaBB.cgi?board=Xing;action=display;num=1071365844;start=18


   By Spinal_Wave (Unregistered Guest) on Sunday, January 04, 2004 - 02:28 pm: Edit Post

Maciej does that a lot. S/he has a hard-on for plagerism, insecurity out the ass, and a penchant for asking what Tim thinks about someone else's opinion constantly.

He or she would be a decent poster aside from that.


   By sc_guy (Unregistered Guest) on Friday, January 09, 2004 - 06:25 am: Edit Post

If you can do "one" technique better than anybody else on this planet then you are the master of that technique. Anybody on earth want to learn that technique will have to come to you.


   By zen_guy (Unregistered Guest) on Friday, January 09, 2004 - 10:48 am: Edit Post

does it matter if you are the best on the planet at one technique and no one knows of you? :-)


   By g (Unregistered Guest) on Friday, January 09, 2004 - 11:25 am: Edit Post

hardly the point


   By Bruce Leroy (Unregistered Guest) on Friday, January 09, 2004 - 11:56 am: Edit Post

Is SC_Guy John Wang from Emptyflower? I think so. Welcome.


   By robert on Friday, September 16, 2005 - 01:23 pm: Edit Post

apply the correct principles to a trained technique and youre not far from perfection.


Add a Message


This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Username:  
Password: